ERIC Identifier: ED350598 Publication Date: 1993-00-00
Author: Thomas, Robert L. Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on
Reading and Communication Skills Bloomington IN.
Cross-Age and Peer Tutoring. ERIC Digest.
WHAT ARE THEY? Cross-age and peer tutoring are methods of instruction in
which learners help each other and in turn learn by teaching.
*PEER TEACHING OR TUTORING is the process by which a competent pupil, with
minimal training and with a teacher's guidance, helps one or more students at
the same grade level learn a skill or concept.
*CROSS-AGE TUTORS are students in higher grade levels who work with younger
HOW ARE TUTORING PROGRAMS ORGANIZED? Peer and cross-age tutoring programs can
take many forms, including the following:
*RESOURCE TUTORING: Where three or four pairs are scheduled together in the
*CLASSROOM TUTORING: Where teachers in two grades set aside a particular time
and place for the tutoring and, in most instances, use cross-age tutoring.
*TAILORED TUTORING: Where a teacher chooses a criterion~such as vocabulary or
fractions~by which to pair students. Both cross-age and peer pairs can be used
in this pattern.
*RIPPLE TUTORING: Where a school begins slowly with only a few groups and
gradually expands until all students and teachers are involved (McAllister,
HOW DOES ONE GET STARTED? Some basic steps are:
*SELECT TUTORS AND STUDENTS: Start with those students most in need and eager
*DESIGN AN APPROPRIATE PROGRAM: Planning is essential to ensuring smooth
implementation and positive outcomes.
*TRAIN TUTORS: Give an overview of what tutoring is, its values and goals,
what to do during a session, and how to help the tutored students.
*SELECT SKILLS AND CONTENT: Some activities lend themselves well to peer
teaching, such as drills and learning games. As skills develop, they need to be
applied to classroom materials and content so that the student will experience
immediate application of new knowledge.
*DESIGN A TUTORING LESSON: Show the tutor how to manage a session, keeping
steps to a minimum.
*MONITOR AND EVALUATE THE PROGRAM: During and at the end of the program,
check for evidence of progress (McAllister, 1990).
WHY ARE TUTORING PROGRAMS EFFECTIVE? Tutoring programs can be structured so
that both tutors and students benefit. According to the research, peer
relationships contribute to social and cognitive development and socialization.
Learning, friendship, and social growth are often positive outcomes.
Some specific benefits of tutoring programs include:
*Children learn positive attitudes, values, and skills through peer modeling.
*Through peer interaction, children learn to share, to help, to comfort, and
to empathize with others.
*Peer relationships have a strong influence on achievement.
*Peer relationships are a powerful influence on a child's development of
identity and autonomy (Benard, 1990).
WHAT ARE CRITICAL INGREDIENTS OF PEER PROGRAMS? Some ingredients appear
essential to creating effective peer programs. They are:
*students must relate to one another to achieve common goals;
*students must be personally accountable for mastering the material and for
helping each other, and must understand that it is to their advantage if other
*students must learn how to build and maintain collaborative relationships;
*in peer tutoring programs, each child must be given an opportunity to be the
helper or to lead a cooperative learning group; and,
*groups must be as heterogeneous as possible in academic ability, ethnicity,
and physical disabilities (Benard, 1990).
WHAT ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF EFFECTIVE PROGRAMS? The U. S. Department of
Education selected the VALUED YOUTH PROGRAM for special recognition and
dissemination through the National Diffusion Network (NDN). It is a cross-age
tutoring program where at-risk secondary students tutor younger, elementary
school students. This program is being used in 17 elementary and secondary
schools in five states (National Diffusion Network, 1992).
STUDENT TEAM LEARNING (STL) is a validated program in which students are
placed in four- or five-member heterogeneous learning teams to master basic
skills initially presented by the teacher (National Diffusion Network, 1992).
WHAT IS AN EXAMPLE OF AN EFFECTIVE PROGRAM SPECIFICALLY IN THE LANGUAGE ARTS?
A recent experimental cross-age tutoring program in one
school district focused on language work, including reading, oral comprehension,
and language-based games and activities (Gautrey, 1990). For these projects,
children chose books to read which were of interest to them and which they
considered were on an appropriate reading level.
One project elementary school provided a set of interest-based books, and at
every session the tutee and tutor selected together a book of common interest to
both of them. First and foremost was that the tutors and tutees enjoyed simply
reading together and discussing the books afterward. This was especially
effective as an introductory activity for the project. Sometimes the tutee read
to the tutor, and then the two exchanged roles. Story writing could be a natural
offshoot of this activity.
In all the projects, language games and activities were elaborated by the
tutors themselves, according to the needs and abilities of the tutee. These
activities proved to be creatively planned by the tutors. Although some of the
tutors were apprehensive at first at the idea of playing teacher, a consistent
and constructive relationship with the organizing teacher seemed to be what
spelled the difference between success and failure of the projects.
All projects took place right in the classroom. Some of the activities (all
developed by the tutors) which were included in the projects were (1) board
games (such as "Chutes and Ladders"); (2) word searches (themes included names,
animals, etc.); (3) crosswords; (4) spelling games (picking out a deliberate
mistake, for example); (5) spot the difference (a discussion of nearly identical
pictures); (6) paired poetry writing; (7) sentence writing by selecting words
from pictures; (8) scrambled words; and (9) grand prix (reading games in racing
car circuit). (For more examples of appropriate and effective games and
activities, see Salmond, 1983).
The opinion of everyone concerned (tutors, tutees, teachers, and
administrators) was that the projects were "successful and enjoyable" and should
be continued (Gautrey, 1990).
Benard, Bonnie (1990). A CASE FOR PEERS.
Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. [ED 327 755]
Please note that this site is privately owned and is in no way related
to any Federal agency or ERIC unit. Further, this site is using a
privately owned and located server. This is NOT a government sponsored
or government sanctioned site. ERIC is a Service Mark of the U.S. Government.
This site exists to provide the text of the public domain ERIC Documents
previously produced by ERIC. No new content will ever appear here
that would in any way challenge the ERIC Service Mark of the U.S. Government.