ERIC Identifier: ED347480
Publication Date: 1992-12-00
Author: Casey, John A.
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Personnel Services Ann Arbor MI.
Counseling Using Technology with At-Risk Youth. ERIC Digest.
Counselors and related human service professionals are increasingly utilizing computer technology in their counseling with at-risk youth. While early use of computers for testing, administration, career, and personal counseling relied primarily upon counseling-specific software, more recent adaptations of noncounseling software for counseling purposes are leading toward successful interventions with at-risk populations.
WHO IS "AT-RISK?"
ADAPTING SOFTWARE FOR PERSONAL COUNSELING
RELATIONSHIP BUILDING
*In Lancaster, Texas, children resistive to counseling have found "The Print Shop" a vehicle for developing rapport and expressing their feelings (Henderson, 1989).
*In Long Beach, California, reluctant learning disabled clients become engaged with the counselor through games of familiarity and attainable success (e.g., "Wheel of Fortune," "MacConcentration").
*In Guerneville, California, students and counselors speaking different languages find common enthusiasm with nonverbal computer games through the counselor (e.g., "Brickles," "Hot Air Balloon").
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
*In Stratford, Connecticut, with boys ages 10-17, Margolies (1991) reports we can observe much about the child: their level of dependency on the therapist, fears, blocking points, approach to and length of play, ability to appreciate or elaborate on fantasy, sense of humor. Other games or drawing programs are used as projective tools.--"
INTERVENTION
*In Rohnert Park, California, ninth graders identified as having the "highest risk" of dropping out are paired with graduate counseling students who together write poetry on word processors, create art on "Kid Pix," or evaluate a variety of low cost shareware games. They subsequently visit a nearby elementary school where the older student tutors a first grader on easy but motivating learning games (Casey & Ramsammy, 1992).
*In West Anchorage, Alaska, at-risk ninth graders are trained as computer resource tutors for other teachers, students, and staff (Orloff, 1991).
*In Palo Alto, California, a counselor reports empowerment through both "playful" software such as "Jam Session" (where students can play like MTV musicians) and more serious software such as spell and grammar checkers on word processing documents (Orloff, 1991).
PREVENTION THROUGH GROUPS, CLASSROOM GUIDANCE AND CONSULTATION
*Using an overhead projection of the computer screen, students develop cooperative learning, positive interdependence, group problem solving and social skills by playing, as a group, such software as "Oregon Trail" or "Carmen Sandiego."
*In Greenwood, Mississippi, kindergarten use of technology "encourages students to become their own problem solvers,...thinking and discovering answers on their own" (Goal, 1992).
*In Peach Springs, Arizona, dropout rates among Hualapai Indians have plummeted with the infusion of videodiscs, interactive video, and satellite communication into the curriculum without counselors.
*In numerous locations, counselors are consulting with teachers to develop intergenerational communication between at-risk youth and senior citizens, through both live computer activities and electronic mail (Henderson, 1989).
WHY TECHNOLOGY?
Gifford (1991) lists seven attributes that make video games both fun and effective learning tools:
*FREE PLAY (CREATIVITY): Electronic games are not tied to the limitations of space, time, or gravity in the way that mechanical toys are. Freed from these constraints, kids can exercise their fantasies without regard to real-world boundaries.
*MICROWORLDS: Computers allow us to move with ease between electronic "microworlds" from one graphical environment to another. The exhilaration of multimedia world-hopping contrasts sharply with the static feeling of conventional classrooms.
*INSTANT REPLAY ENCOURAGES RISK TAKING: Computers can provide an instant replay of students' performances, allowing them to study, edit, or try again in a safe environment for risk-taking.
*MASTERY: Even when kids are struggling to learn a complex computer game, they usually feel they are in control. When the worst happens, they can always shut the machine off. The feeling of control is encouraged by the ease with which players can repeat an activity until it has been mastered.
*INTERACTION: Kids tend to experience computers as partners in learning. They relish this nonhierarchical relationship in which the roles of teacher and student are blurred or altered.
*CLEAR GOALS: Children in the classroom cannot always see the point of learning math, science, or social studies. When they play electronic games, they are usually working toward a clear objective--making a rescue, unlocking a door, unearthing hidden treasure. Compelling goals give game players high levels of motivation.
*INTENSE ABSORPTION: Short attention spans and poor impulse control frequently disappear with effective computer interventions, supporting the notion changing the environment, not the child, can support individual success.
CONSIDERATIONS
*UNAPPEALING SOFTWARE--rote learning and other overtly educational software are usually met with yawns.
*WAITING TOO LONG--older computers, like Apple IIe's, or too many students for one computer create more problems than they solve.
*INADEQUATE TRAINING--constrained budgets limit training opportunities, but successful counselors work in concert with other technology-literate staff.
*DEPERSONALIZATION--the focus should be on the client first, the technology second. If the client or counselor loses this priority, problems may be exacerbated by the technology.
Additional ethical, moral, and practical issues associated with technology and counseling are discussed by Walz, Gazda, and Shertzer (1991).
DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY
Additional research on outcome effectiveness, individual differences in computer motivation, and other aspects of this emerging field are needed. New adaptations, such as infusion into family therapy and other counseling services, remain equally unexplored. Nevertheless, early signs of success are encouraging and challenge the counselor to remain current with new technologies and their potential for adaptation to counseling with at-risk youth.
REFERENCES
Gifford, B. R. (1991, August 7). The learning society: Serious play. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 7.
Goal: Engaging young at-risk learners. (1992, May/June). Electronic Learning, p. 28.
Henderson, H. J. (1989). Counseling with computers: Technology and techniques. Lancaster, TX: 3S Co.
Margolies, R. (1991). The computer as a social skills agent. T.H.E. Journal, 18(6), 70-71.
Orloff, J. H. (Ed.). (1991). Macintosh educational software guide. Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer, Inc.
Walz, G. R., Gazda, G. M., & Shertzer, B. (1991). Counseling futures. Ann Arbor, MI: ERIC Counseling and Personnel Services Clearinghouse, The University of Michigan.
