ERIC Identifier: ED358749
Publication Date: 1993-03-00
Author: Rabideau, Dan
Source: National Clearinghouse on Literacy Education Washington DC., Adjunct ERIC Clearinghouse on Literacy Education for Limited-English-Proficient Adults Washington DC.
Integrating Reading and Writing into Adult ESL Instruction. ERIC Digest.
Reading and writing play a larger role in language instruction for adult learners today than they have in the recent past. Reading and writing were never completely removed from adult English as a Second Language (ESL) curricula, but during the early 1980s there was a shift toward oral/aural instructional goals and practices. That shift was motivated by learners' needs; many adults had a limited amount of time to spend in a program, and their most immediate need seemed to be oral communication. Some learners came to adult programs with very limited formal schooling, and an oral/aural approach allowed them more opportunities to participate in class. In fact, oral communicative ability is still a primary goal of much adult ESL instruction, but the pendulum is swinging back toward a greater emphasis on reading and writing.
Certainly, the value of oral communicative classroom activities has been demonstrated (Asher, 1982; Savignon, 1983), and no one would endorse abandoning what we know to be effective about those practices. But reading and writing, which are valid instructional activities in themselves, allow for more reflection and contemplation. For example, Tarvin and Al-Arishi (1991) suggest that oral activities in the classroom frequently make reflection and contemplation difficult because of the need for an immediate response. Rodby (1987) found that young adult nonnative English speakers employed by the California Conservation Corps survived for years in the oral English-dominant workplace without ever learning English. They engaged in interactions in English as little as possible and simply made sure they understood and fulfilled the simple directions given by their supervisors. It was not until they began communicating in writing with their teacher and each other in class that they became motivated to learn English and began to acquire it. In informal reading and writing activities, the Corps members were able to work with language that "stood still" (as one of them explained). They could look at it, take time with it, and manipulate it, so they were not so overwhelmed by it.
This digest describes some of the major reading and writing practices currently in use in adult ESL programs (see also Crandall & Peyton, in press, for detailed descriptions of these and other approaches).
RELATING ESL LITERACY INSTRUCTION TO LEARNER DIFFERENCES
"Reading and writing for language acquisition" is used with learners who have completed a basic education in their first language. Reading texts that match learner interests and English proficiency provide learners with comprehensible language input--a chance to learn new vocabulary in context and to see the syntax of the language. Writing allows learners opportunities to experiment with the language and try different constructions to make themselves understood.
"More complex reading and writing tasks" are appropriate for learners with some literacy background in their own language or in English. Many ESL programs now use a process approach to writing instruction, and some regularly publish collections of learner writing (see Peyton, 1991, for an overview). Many of the contributors to "Voices" magazine (a well known publication written by and for adult learners and published by the Invergarry Learning Centre in Vancouver, British Columbia) are taking ESL classes.
In literature-based programs, learners often select their own reading texts. The most popular are high interest/low reading level books, fiction or non-fiction. Two series of such books particularly appropriate for ESL students are "Hopes and Dreams" (Fearon/Janus/Quercus, Belmont, CA) and "Fitting In" (New Readers Press, Syracuse, NY). Both of these series are fictionalized accounts of the experiences of immigrants, but ESL instructors needn't feel limited to works about immigrants. Many of the high/low books written for adult new readers are appropriate for ESL learners as well, although care needs to be taken that cultural concepts and idiomatic expressions are accessible. When the text is written at an accessible level and the story is engaging, readers usually get past unfamiliar words and derive meaning from the context.
Rosow (1990) describes using junk mail and other advertisements as reading texts in a consumer skills class. Whatever they select to read, learners read complete texts that they have chosen, rather than the short, decontextualized passages commonly found in skills books.
Marc Freedman (1991) has done a small survey of current uses of writing in adult ESL classes. He interviewed 14 ESL practitioners from the Division of Adult and Continuing Education at the City University of New York and several community-based organizations in the New York City area, and found three purposes for writing. The first purpose has to do with practicing language:
"Many traditional, workbook-style writing exercises seem predicated on the idea that practicing writing [that is already] correctly formulated serves the purpose of concretizing learning....While extreme versions of this view have gone the way of the bronto-audio-lingual-saurus, many teachers of beginning/low literacy students stress the need for a great deal of repetition of simplified forms in order for students to build a base upon which to work" (p.11).
The second purpose has to do with experimenting with language, encouraging learners to attempt to write things they want to express, even if they are unsure of how to do it. This emphasis does the following:
* It develops an experimental or exploratory approach to language and literacy learning in which the learner plays an active role;
* It allows learners to set their own goals and focus on the language necessary for what they are trying to convey in writing;
* It provides opportunities for learners to explore resources other than the teacher (e.g., their own, perhaps underestimated, knowledge; the knowledge of other students; dictionaries; texts; or their own notes) (p. 12).
The third purpose has to do with "communication." While an oral utterance is usually based on a preceding utterance or event, has an immediate impact on what happens next, and is of immediate concern to the speaker, many writing activities share none of these characteristics. Interactive writing activities such as letter writing, electronic mail interactions, and dialogue journals (Peyton & Staton, 1991) do have these qualities and thus strengthen the link between written and oral language.
Crandall, J., & Peyton, J.K. (Eds.). (in press). "Approaches to adult ESL literacy instruction." Washington, DC and McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
D'Annunzio, A. (1990). A nondirective combinatory model in an adult ESL program. "Journal of Reading," 34(3), 198-202.
Dixon, C., & Nessel, D. (1983). "Language experience approach to reading (and writing)." Hayward, CA: Alemany.
Freedman, M. (1991). "Writing for language acquisition in beginning and low-literacy adult ESOL classes." Paper presented at the conference of the New York State TESOL, Albany.
Peyton, J.K. (1991). "Listening to students' voices: Educational materials written by and for adults learning English." ERIC Digest. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Literacy Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 317 096)
Peyton, J.K., & Staton, J. (Eds.) (1991). "Writing our lives: Reflections on dialogue journal writing with adults learning English." Washington, DC and Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Center for Applied Linguistics and Regents/Prentice Hall. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 333 763)
Rabideau, D. (1991). Language experience approach for limited English proficient adults. "Information Update," 7(2), 20-24.
Rodby, J. (1987). "Literacy as a catalyst to second language acquisition." Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Rosow, L. (1990). Consumer advocacy, empowerment, and adult literacy. "Journal of Reading," 34(4), 258-262.
Savignon, S.J. (1983). "Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice." Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Tarvin, W.L., & Al-Arishi, A.Y. (1991). Rethinking communicative language teaching: Reflection and the EFL classroom. "TESOL Quarterly," 28(1), 9-27.
Taylor, M. (1992). "The language experience approach and adult learners." ERIC Digest. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Literacy Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 887)
"Voices: New writers for new readers." Vancouver, BC: Invergarry Learning Centre. Available from Delta Systems Company, Inc., 1400 Miller Parkway, McHenry, IL 60050 (800-323-8270).
An earlier version of this article appeared in "Literacy Harvest" (Winter, 1992), 1(1), published by the Literacy Assistance Center.