ERIC Identifier: ED392467
Publication Date: 1996-04-00
Author: Schamber, Linda
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology Syracuse NY.
Library Collection Development in an Electronic Age. ERIC Digest.
Electronic technologies and collection development are two of the top concerns in library and information science today. In a recent analysis of the literature, four major trends in library and information science were identified: increases in end-user access to computer-based information resources; library use of networks and telecommunications; dependency on CD-ROM-based information sources; and emphasis on collection management activities (Brennan, 1991).
Clearly, collection management is a fundamental concern. Demas puts the matter into perspective this way: "Electronic publishing has profound implications for collection development, which is defined as the intentional and systematic building of the set of information resources to which the library provides access. While the principles of collection development, which were developed in the world of print publications, do not change radically with new publishing technologies, methods of decision making and specific selection guidelines must be adjusted significantly to incorporate new publishing formats" (1994, p. 71).
Although most of the current literature cited below refers to academic or research libraries, much of the content applies to all types of libraries. This digest will focus on problems and solutions of practical interest to all librarians.
Three areas of collection development that seem to be the most problematic are selection, acquisitions, and inter-institutional cooperation. Two themes pervade the discussions: the shift in library philosophy from ownership of locally stored resources to provision of access to electronically stored resources; and the need for rethinking collection development policy, both to support the new philosophy and to better deal with new types of resources on a day-to-day basis.
- SELECTION: An updated textbook on collection development by Evans contains an entire chapter on electronic materials in which he first emphasizes the importance of needs assessment. "The electronic environment," he says, "creates several dichotomies...print versus electronic; ownership versus access; user versus institutional need; free versus fee; gatekeeper versus user selection. It is not a matter of either/or, rather it is a matter of determining the proper local mix" (1995, p. 260). The next step in the selection of electronic materials is the formulation of collection policy and practice. Evans discusses formats and selection issues, and provides two valuable sample documents: a sample policy for electronic resources management, including 41 selection criteria related to library policy, vendors, technical concerns, costs, and local needs; and a checklist for CD-ROM products and subscriptions.
Although many selection criteria for electronic resources are the same as those for print, electronic resources present special problems. For example, LaGuardia and Bentley (1992) provide a list of questions to ask when selecting CD-ROM resources. These questions are related to administrative costs and effort, vendor reliability, and technical hardware and software requirements. In addition to these considerations, Shreeves (1992) discusses matters of markup or tagging that affect perceptions of the quality and authenticity of scholarly texts in the humanities.
- ACQUISITIONS: Acquisitions staff experienced the most changes with the advent of automated processing. From the beginning, automation eased the labor of this detail-intensive and repetitive work. Improvements continue with enhanced integrated library systems, and time-sharing services from bibliographic utilities or vendors (see Evans, 1995, Zhou, 1994).
The most radical change, however, is not related to technology, but to policy. Smith and Johnson suggest that libraries "reverse the approach that they have followed throughout the print era: rather than buying as much as they possibly can to respond to any present or potential need, they should acquire only the most heavily and regularly used material for processing and retention" (1993, p. 392). They suggest that nothing should be purchased on the basis of long-term planning. The single criterion should be current user satisfaction, with a goal of fast and effective delivery or access, not ownership.
- INTER-INSTITUTIONAL COOPERATION: The tradition of cooperative collection development and resource sharing among libraries began decades ago as means to alleviate problems of lack of space and costly duplication, especially for little-used materials. Now, with electronic networks facilitating cooperation, the lines are blurring as to what constitutes ownership and resource sharing. Because of the vast storage capacity of electronic media, space is no longer the issue. Rather, the issue for libraries is the role they should play in access provision and document delivery when end-users have direct access to OPACs and myriad other information resources available through network connections (Evans, 1995).
Crowe and Sanders (1992) see these technology-driven changes as actually increasing the need for cooperation and communication among institutions. In order to continue to provide effective physical access to documents, libraries must increase cooperation to overcome potential funding and management problems, such as communication failures, and lack of standard access and authority for resource sharing.
The ultimate vision, according to Summerhill (1992), is a single network to be shared by library personnel and end-users--in effect a restructured inter-library lending model. He foresees innumerable opportunities for sharing information resources via electronic networks. Libraries will be called upon more than ever to make decisions about mounting databases on local systems, and providing access to remote resources and services.
MEETING THE CHALLENGES
Crowe and Sanders (1992) describe OHIOLink, a consortium of 17 academic libraries, as a model for cooperative collection development. The success of such a project, they say, depends on an aggressive commitment by its organizers. Specifications for OHIOLink include ease of use by collection managers, regular provision of data for routine reports, and the capability to collect and analyze usage data across the system. Seven functions, such as the ability to analyze collections and to form cost projections, are specifically intended to aid collection management.
Finally, in view of serious fiscal concerns in collection development, Shad (1992) outlines a seven-part agenda for rethinking priorities: planning, allocating, faculty liaison, cooperative collection development, evaluating, acquisitions alternatives, and selection efficiency. Although the agenda does not directly address the challenges of new technologies, it is geared toward responding to the overriding issue of the changing philosophy from ownership to access.
Crowe, W. J. & Sanders, N. P. (1992). Collection development in the cooperative environment. "Journal of Library Administration," 15(3-4), 37-48. (EJ 446 237)
Demas, S. (1994). Collection development for the electronic library: A conceptual and organizational model. "Library Hi-Tech," 12(3), 71-80. (EJ 491 520)
Eisenberg, M. B., Spitzer, K. L., Kingsley, I., & Darby, C. (1990). "Trends and issues in library and information science 1990." ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources. (ED 335 061)
Evans, G. E. (1995). "Developing library and information center collections," 3rd ed. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Harloe, B. & Budd, J. M. (1994, May). Collection development and scholarly communication in the era of electronic access. "Journal of Academic Librarianship," 20(2), 83-87. (EJ 486 709)
LaGuardia, C. & Bentley, S. (1992, July). Electronic databases: Will old collection development policies still work? "Online," 16(4), 60-63. (EJ 447 462)
Otero-Boisvert, M. (1993). The role of the collection development librarian in the 90's and beyond. "Journal of Library Administration," 18(3-4), 159-170. (EJ 476 169)
Shad, J. G. (1992, March). The future of collection development in an era of fiscal stringency: A symposium. "Journal of Academic Librarianship," 18(1), 4-16. (EJ 443 408)
Shreeves, E. (1992, Spring). Between the visionaries and the Luddites: Collection development and electronic resources in the humanities. "Library Trends," 40(4), 579-595. (EJ 461 662)
Smith, E. & Johnson, P. (1993, September). How to survive the present while preparing for the future: A research library strategy. "College and Research Libraries," 54(5), 389-396. (EJ 469 170)
Summerhill, C. A. (1992). Internetworking: New opportunities and challenges in resource sharing. "Resource Sharing and Information Networks," 8(1), 105-125. (EJ 464 349)
Zhou, Y. (1994, Spring). From smart guesser to smart navigator: Changes in collection development for research libraries in a network environment. "Library Trends," 42(4), 648-660. (EJ 489 792)
Please note that this site is privately owned and is in no way related to any Federal agency or ERIC unit. Further, this site is using a privately owned and located server. This is NOT a government sponsored or government sanctioned site. ERIC is a Service Mark of the U.S. Government. This site exists to provide the text of the public domain ERIC Documents previously produced by ERIC. No new content will ever appear here that would in any way challenge the ERIC Service Mark of the U.S. Government.