ERIC Identifier: ED355251
Publication Date: 1992-12-00
Author: Shafer, Mary Morello
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on
Tests Measurement and Evaluation Washington DC.
National Assessments in Europe and Japan. ERIC/TM Digest.
There have been numerous proposals lately calling for the establishment of a
national assessment system. Congress authorized a state-level trial
administration of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. The Secretary
of Labor's Commission on Acquiring Needed Skills and the Business Roundtable
have separately called for a national high school graduation examination.
Examining testing practices in other countries can help formulate ideas and
issues in establishing a national assessment system in the United States. Based
on recent reports by the Office of Technology and Assessment and the National
Endowment for the Humanities, this digest provides an overview of the national
examinations in several European nations and Japan. Further information about
the programs can be found in the references.
TESTS IN OTHER COUNTRIES
France. In the 1950s, the "baccalaureat" was a narrowly focused examination of humanities and mathematics.
The test provided strict comparability across the entire country. As French
schools became more diversified, serving a broader range of students and using a
broader range of curricular options, the "baccalaureat" has become a highly
differentiated, complex exam system with 28 different options and 23 different
sets of questions.
Students prepare for the exam in upper-secondary schools called "lycees." At
age 15 to 16, students begin a three-year, specialized course of study. Along
with the essay-type exams in the core subjects--history and geography, French,
and philosophy--students take additional exams in the areas they concentrated
on--philosophy and liberal arts, economics and social sciences, or mathematics
and the sciences. Students also take oral exams in some subjects, usually
Today, the "baccalaureat" is not a single, nationally comparable exam that
all students take. The French Ministry of National Education determines the
curricula of all schools and creates the various "baccalaureat" exams. In 1990,
50 percent of the "lycee" students took the "baccalaureat," and 38.5 percent of
those students passed the exam. Until recently, passing the "baccalaureat"
admitted students to a French university, but now most prestigious schools
require students to pass further exams (Madaus & Kellaghan, 1991).
Federal Republic of Germany. Like the "baccalaureat," the German "Abitur" has
changed over the years to respond to changes in German society. And like the
"baccalaureat," the German exam relies on open-ended questions and, to some
extent, oral exams. In some subjects--art, music, and natural sciences--the
exams may involve performance or demonstration. Although the general form of the
"Abitur" is the same throughout the country, the individual education ministries
of each state determine the specific content of the test given in their areas.
German students planning to continue their education at a university
typically attend "Gymnasien," which go through grade 13. Students take the
Abitur at the end of that time. Their scores on that exam, along with their
grades in their final two years at the "Gymnasien," determine whether they are
admitted to a German university.
In 1986, 23.7 percent of the students taking the exam qualified for the
university. Today, that number is higher. Because so many students now qualify
for the university in Germany, those wanting to pursue some of the most
desirable fields, like medicine, have to undergo further tests and interviews
and must sometimes wait some time before being admitted to those programs.
England and Wales. In one sense, assessment in England has gone through a
complete cycle. First, England had a General School Certificate and an
associated London Matric. Then, England and Wales abandoned these, along with
the state-prescribed curriculum. In recent years, England and Wales have adopted
what amounts to a national curriculum and a comprehensive assessment program.
These new tests include open-ended exercises, oral exams, and realistic
scenarios. England's long-standing Cities and Guilds vocational assessment
program exemplifies what the United States now calls "authentic assessment."
When students in England and Wales finish their compulsory education (around
age 16), they take exams leading to the General Certificate of Secondary
Education (GCSE). This certificate is linked to the national curriculum being
developed. College-bound students then continue on to a two-year course of
specialized study, usually in three areas. When they finish, they take advanced,
or A-level, exams in different subject areas. In 1988-1989, 22 percent of all
18-year-olds passed one or more A-level exam; 12 percent passed three or more
Regional and university-affiliated boards develop and administer the
different GCSE and A-level exams used throughout England and Wales. The School
Examinations and Assessment Council, established by Parliament, approves
syllabuses and exams for the GCSE.
The British educational environment looks much like the U.S. educational
scene today. The arguments for the changes in Britain sound much like the
arguments in the United States: the schools are failing; the morale among
teachers is at an all-time low; and only comprehensive testing programs will
show that schools are returning value for the public's investment. That way,
teachers will receive the respect and financial rewards they deserve. Critics
maintain, however, that national tests will reduce teacher autonomy and that
accountability for schools does not necessarily mean that students will do
Japan. Until 1954, Japan used a single standardized exam to determine whether
students went on to a university. From 1954 to 1976, Japan tried various other
systems, finally arriving at the current two-stage system. First, students
planning to attend a national or local public university in Japan take the Test
of the National Center for University Entrance Examination. Some students
planning to attend private universities also take the exam. The multiple-choice
exam covers five subject areas: Japanese, humanities and the social sciences,
mathematics, science, and foreign language.
But most universities consider other factors, including grades, along with
students' scores on that exam. Many universities develop their own exam and
administer it to applicants. These second-stage exams usually require students
to write short essays on various topics, and the exams may include some items to
test students' aptitude.
Japanese students face intense competition to gain a place at a public
university. In 1990, only one in four students taking the first-stage exam found
a place at a university. Students often attend juku, "cramm schools," to prepare
for their exams. And Japanese newspapers print the full text of each year's
exam, indicating the importance of these exams in the country.
This brief overview outlines some of the diversity
in the assessment programs of other countries. Carefully conducted case studies
of these testing programs can lead to lessons that apply directly to testing in
the United States. We need to consider four issues when evaluating national
o examination uniformity,
o format, and
A uniform exam administered nationwide provides comparable and readily
communicated scores. However, a nationwide exam might ill-serve regional needs
and diverse populations. Further, a national testing program might encourage a
national curriculum, an idea hotly debated in many countries.
Choice means to what degree students can decide which tests to take to assess
their abilities. Choice gives individual students the chance to demonstrate
their interests, strengths, and potential. Using different tests, however,
weakens the sense of a national culture and confuses the interpretation of the
Tests can take various formats. Many educators argue that multiple-choice
tests yield objective, comparable scores. And these tests are relatively
inexpensive and easy to administer. But others argue that performance-type
questions are more closely aligned to curricular goals and give more valid
measures of the types of skills we're trying to instill in students.
Score reports can also take various forms. Numerical scores provide a
semblance of precision; single numbers are easier to evaluate. Descriptions and
multiple scores, however, can give much more information.
Noah, Harold J., & Max A. Eckstein (1989).
Tradeoffs in examination policies: An international comparative perspective.
Oxford Review of Education, 15(1), 17-27.
Madaus, George F., & Thomas Kellaghan (1991). Student examination systems
in the European community: Lessons for the United States. Report submitted to
the Office of Technology Assessment, United States Congress.
Lynne V. Cheney, Chairman (1991). National tests: What other countries expect
their students to know. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Humanities.