Models for Improving College Teaching: A Faculty
Resource. ERIC Digest.
by Travis, Jon E.
Colleges and universities increasingly are investing attention and energy
on issues related to teaching and learning. Institutions may be reacting
to public demands for improved student outcomes or criticism of dominant
research agendas. Still, because of the service they provide, some institutions
of higher education may be focusing more on teaching and learning out of
genuine concern and a sense of responsibility to students. Whether the
motivation stems from a disturbed populace or a recognized obligation,
colleges are making a commitment to improve student learning.
How well institutions respond to this "new" teaching and learning agenda
may be a matter of debate, especially if some of the following criteria
are considered: tangible rewards for good teaching, public recognition
of faculty, resource centers for instructional development, credit for
research and publication of teaching issues, and preparation of graduate
students for college teaching (Halpern and Associates 1994). However an
individual institution approaches such issues, faculty still bear the major
responsibility for student learning (Davis 1993). Hence, faculty are expected
to inspire an instructional renaissance (Svinicki 1990). As a consequence,
faculty may renew their own commitment to lifelong learning and rekindle
once again the excitement of discovery.
WHAT CAN FACULTY DO TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNING?
As learning becomes more complex, students frequently depend upon faculty
to assist them with a multitude of obstacles. Yet, given the typical preparation
college faculty receive for teaching, the tendency to concentrate on presentational
methods, like the lecture, can aggravate students' difficulties with learning.
Consequently, instructors are encouraged to stop viewing teaching as 'covering
the content' and to start viewing it as "helping the students learn" (Svinicki
1990, p. 7). Such a change in process orientation can lead to a focus on
understanding how people learn and the variables and variations of learning
that are possible, which can be accomplished through the use of resources
designed to facilitate learning by transforming college teaching.
WHAT RESOURCES EXIST THAT CAN HELP FACULTY IMPROVE LEARNING?
To help faculty achieve such an instructional transformation, numerous
faculty development programs and professionals promote the development
of expertise in teaching. Supporting an array of initiatives, such as instructional
grants, workshops and discussion groups, classroom observation, and microteaching,
faculty development efforts enable instructors to consider adaptations
to their teaching (Weimer 1990). In addition, reference and research information,
hardware technology and support, and advisory personnel can augment existing
resources. Each opportunity is intended to offer faculty insight into the
significant accumulation of knowledge about teaching and learning (Menges,
Weimer, and Associates 1996). Among the resources available for faculty
is an array of innovative improvement strategies and classroom methods,
such as cooperative learning, case method, test feedback, and videotaping.
Some of these strategies have a formal structure, an extensive research
base, and applicability to almost any discipline. Such strategies have
been described as "teaching improvement models" (Svinicki 1990).
WHAT ADDITIONAL RESOURCES MIGHT FACULTY NEED TO PROMOTE LEARNING?
While these resources, strategies, and models can be beneficial for
enhancing learning, the hardworking faculty member in higher education,
who often is faced with increasing demands to do more and to be more effective,
may not be able to review this vast and diffuse assortment of options (Svinicki
1990). Challenged daily to fulfill their institutional requirements and
to meet the needs of a diverse group of students, faculty should have a
selection of innovative teaching and learning techniques in an easy-to-use
format. Although some faculty development programs may support projects
to disseminate information on one or two teaching improvement models, the
tendency to group such models for discussion and selection, much like a
menu, is rare. Hence, a comprehensive and concise compilation of teaching
improvement models could provide faculty with a useful resource not previously
WHAT ARE SOME OF THE MODELS INCLUDED IN THIS COLLECTION?
The teaching improvement models included in this report were selected
on the basis of their relative novelty for faculty, compared to more familiar
strategies like writing-across-the-curriculum or simulation. The collection
comprises six categories of models: models for assessment and feedback,
discussion and sharing, dissemination, clinical development, teaching and
learning, and instructional planning. The models include Classroom Assessment,
the Great Teachers Seminar, the Integration of Teaching and Learning Styles,
the Instructional Skills Workshop, Adaptive Control of Thought, Multiple
Intelligences and Teaching, Instructional Event Design, and the Five-Step
Process for Improving Teaching. These and other models similarly designed
to enhance learning offer specific procedures that can be implemented easily,
without formal training.
WHAT ARE THE TEACHING IMPROVEMENT MODELS DESIGNED TO DO?
One purpose of this collection is to encourage faculty to reflect on
the learning process and on the influence of their teaching. Each model
selected for improving college teaching was originally designed to meet
a distinct faculty need, whether feedback from students, the opportunity
to share thoughts and strategies with peers, or the collection and dissemination
of ideas among faculty. Other models focus on instructional improvement
in a secure environment, course and curriculum design, and an understanding
of learning theory and various learning styles.
WHY SHOULD COLLEGE FACULTY CONSIDER OR IMPLEMENT THESE MODELS?
Higher education in the United States has been challenged to improve
students' learning experiences. Given sufficient support and resources,
college and university faculty have the capability to enhance their students'
learning. The models in this collection offer faculty an assortment of
resources to use in this endeavor.
Davis, Barbara G. 1993. Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Halpern, Diane F. and Associates. 1994. Changing College Classrooms:
New Teaching and Learning Strategies for an Increasingly Complex World.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Menges, Robert J., Maryellen Weimer, and Associates. 1996. Teaching
on Solid Ground: Using Scholarship to Improve Practice. San Francisco:
Svinicki, Marilla D., ed. 1990. The Changing Face of College Teaching.
New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 42. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Weimer, Maryellen. 1990. Improving College Teaching: Strategies for
Developing Instructional Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.