Site Links



Search for ERIC Digests


About This Site and Copyright


Privacy Policy

Resources for Library Instruction


Information Literacy Blog

ERIC Identifier: ED402146
Publication Date: 1996-03-00
Author: Murphy, Nancy
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education Columbus OH.

Multicultural Mathematics and Science: Effective K-12 Practices for Equity. ERIC Digest.

Educational reform initiatives such as the NCTM Standards, National Science Education Standards, and Project 2061 provide guidelines to reduce the diversity gap in science and mathematics literacy. Schools are applying these guidelines to classroom practice, posing questions about what changes are feasible given the multiple pressures on today's schools. This digest provides references to successful practices which have increased mathematics and science achievement among diverse student populations.


In most public schools non-white students have been more likely to end up in a "tracked" route that did not include college preparatory mathematics and science courses in high school. Many programs are challenging that practice with good results by preparing all students for the college preparatory track (Silva, Moses, Rivers, & Johnson, 1990), placing all students in gifted classes (Hanson, Walker, & Flom, 1995), detracking mathematics courses and standardizing the curriculum during the first few weeks until mobility lessens (Miner, 1995), and integrating the content of high school mathematics classes (Kysh, 1995). Schools are implementing innovative assessment practices which make expectations and assessment criteria explicit for teachers and students (Waters, Burger, & Burger, 1995).


When access to computers is equitable, technology improves opportunities for diverse student populations. Computer-based labs and data analysis allow students to connect mathematics and science to real issues in their communities (Sheppo, Hartsfield, Ruff, Jones & Holinga, 1994; Smith, 1989). The use of interactive software for geometry, algebra, and calculus empowered students to use fundamental ideas, multiple representations, and technology-assisted methods to reason about applied problems and mathematical ideas (Heid & Zbiek, 1995). Videodiscs and CD-ROMs provide clearer imagery and examples of science and mathematics topics (Rock & Cummings, 1994).


Schools are using projects and exhibitions in which students experience connected, applied mathematics and science. Some teach mathematics and science entirely through student-generated business projects (Benedict, 1992). Meaning-centered, constructivist methods are helping students master science, mathematics, and language acquisition skills (Minicucci, Berman, McLeod, Nelson, & Woodworth, 1995).


Students bring different cultural patterns to the classroom through language use, space and time interactions, problem-solving techniques, and interactional styles. They also bring different prior experiences and frames of reference for imagining concrete applications of abstract ideas. Schools are providing instruction that supports these varied cultural styles and experiences by establishing all-girls science classes (Pollina, 1995), using culturally-relevant materials (Matthews & Smith, 1994), creating options where students can choose between options that celebrate diversity or provide cultural immersion (Piper, 1994).


Equitable schools show that it is important to help teachers obtain the knowledge and experience to connect mathematics and science in relevant ways to the lives of their students. Teachers need to know how children think in mathematics in order to make appropriate instructional decisions based on what each child knows and can do (Carey, Fennema, Carpenter & Franke, 1995). Teachers with personal experience in applied science and mathematics can apply their experiences to promote connected and integrated learning (Minicucci et al., 1995; Phillips & Ebrahimi, 1993). Equally important is empowering teachers with the ability to make instructional and curricular decisions and to restructure school time for teacher collaboration, exploration, and professional development (Navaez, Jr. 1994; Ohanian, 1993). Other successful behaviors of equitable teachers are including parents as active partners, demanding intellectual rigor and challenge, disciplining without demeaning or abusive behavior, and improving student attendance (Ladson-Billings, 1994).


High parental involvement characterizes many successful schools. Some involve parents in all aspects of curriculum decision-making and classroom management (Davis, 1995; Minicucci et al., 1995). Others help families support science and math reasoning at home (Sears & Nedearis, 1992; Campbell, 1994).


Many diverse students attribute their success in science and mathematics to a nurturing relationship with an adult who provides high expectations, mentoring, and support as students delve into the many unknowns of mathematics and science problem solving (Kahle, 1987). This component plus a nurturing school community is helpful for diverse students. Effective schools provide a structure that supports caring teachers and counselors who work together to provide in-class intervention for students in need (Benedict, 1992).


Benedict, R. (1992). Trashcan kids. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Campbell, P. B. (1994). Programs to encourage girls in math and science: Some research and evaluation results. Groton, MA: Campbell-Kibler Associates.

Carey, D. A., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Franke, M. L. (1995). Equity and mathematics education. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 93-125). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, B. M. (1995). How to involve parents in a multicultural school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Hanson, S., Walker, J., & Flom, B. (1995). Growing smart: What's working for girls in school. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.

Heid, K. M., & Zbiek, R. M. (1995). A technology-intensive approach to algebra. The Mathematics Teacher, 88(8), 650-656.

Kahle, J. B. (1987). SCORES: A project for change. International Journal of Science Education, 9, 325-333.

Kysh, J. M. (1995). College preparatory mathematics: Change from within. The Mathematics Teacher, 88(8), 660-666.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Matthews, C. E., & Smith, W. S. (1994). Native American related materials in elementary science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 363-380.

Miner, B. (1995). Algebra for all: An equation for equity. In D. Levine, R. Lowe, & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking schools: An agenda for change (pp. 171-174). New York: The New Press.

Minicucci, C., Berman, B. M., McLeod, B., Nelson, B., & Woodworth, K. (1995). School reform and student diversity. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(77-80).

Navaez Jr., A. (1994). A gem of a choice. Educational leadership, 51(1), 9-11.

Ohanian, S. (1993). Garbage pizza, patchwork quilts, and math magic: Stories about teachers who love to teach and children who love to learn. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Phillips, S., & Ebrahimi, H. (1993). Equation for success: Project SEED. In G. Cuevas & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Reaching all students with mathematics (pp. 59-72). Reston, VA: National Council for Teachers of Mathematics.

Piper, P. S. (1994). Schools-within-a-school: The Kapa'a Elementary School model. Educational Innovations in the Pacific, 1(2), 1-3.

Pollina, A. (1995). Gender balance: Lessons from girls in science and mathematics. Educational Leadership, 53(September), 30-33.

Rock, H. M., & Cummings, A. (1994). Can videodiscs improve student outcomes? Educational Leadership, 51(7), 46-50.

Sears, N. C., & Nedearis, L. (1992). A progress report on implementation of a family involvement project for early childhood mathematics among children of the Oklahoma Seminole Head Start and Boley Head Start. [ED 352 172].

Sheppo, K. G., Hartsfield, S. J., Ruff, S., Jones, C. A., & Holinga, M. (1994). How an urban school promotes inclusion. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 82-84.

Silva, C. M., Moses, R. P., Rivers, J., & Johnson, P. (1990). The Algebra Project: Making middle school mathematics count. Journal of Negro Education, 59, 375-391.

Smith, L. B. (1989). A catalog of successful math programs across Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina. (Vol. II). Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Southeast Educational Improvement Laboratory. [ED 301 001].

Waters, T., Burger, D., & Burger, S. (1995). Moving up before moving on. Educational Leadership, 52(6), 35-40.


Library Reference Search

Please note that this site is privately owned and is in no way related to any Federal agency or ERIC unit.  Further, this site is using a privately owned and located server. This is NOT a government sponsored or government sanctioned site. ERIC is a Service Mark of the U.S. Government. This site exists to provide the text of the public domain ERIC Documents previously produced by ERIC.  No new content will ever appear here that would in any way challenge the ERIC Service Mark of the U.S. Government.

| privacy