Science Fairs in Elementary School. ERIC Digest.
by Balas, Andrea K.
Science fair projects have long been familiar events in schools throughout
the country, and they have come to represent science in action, science
as inquiry. The investigatory aspect of science fair projects fits wellwith
current reform efforts guided by such publications as "Science for All
Americans," "Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy," and the "National Science
Education Standards." Classroom science is steadily being transformed into
a process-driven, inquiry-based area of study, and science fair projects
provide additional opportunities for students to become personally and
directly involved in scientific investigation.
Elementary schools participate in science fairs for a variety of reasons:
to stimulate student interest in science, to provide students with opportunities
for research and active inquiry, to publicly recognize students' completed
projects, and to provide students with opportunities to share their work
(Perry,1995). There are many variations in format, but the primary components
of a science fair project typically include an investigation, a written
research report, a visual display, an oral presentation, and some sort
of assessment. Learning some scientific facts or principles is a valuable
fringe benefit for students doing projects, but the primary objective for
science project work is to teach students to think (Tant, 1992, p.5.)
Students participating in science fairs are doing more than learning
something new; they are using and extending knowledge gained previously
through other experiences. Science fair work plans help students organize
and review background information gained through previous library research
on topics of interest. Past experiences will also help students make decisions
on the importance of information to their topics.
The more a student knows about a topic, the easier it is to learn and
remember new information (Recht & Leslie, 1988, as cited in Bruning,
et al., 1995). Science fair projects provide students another avenue of
learning more about topics of personal interest to them while also demonstrating
both factual knowledge in written reports and procedural knowledge through
the research process itself (Bruning, et al, 1995). Together, prior knowledge
and newly acquired knowledge enable students to generate, analyze, and
assess the impact of their findings, as well as connect what they learn
to experiences beyond the science fair project.
DEVELOPMENTAL AND KNOWLEDGE LEVELS
The operational stages defined by Piaget's theory of cognitive development
largely influence the types of science fair projects that elementary school
students can be expected to conduct (Piaget,1969, as cited in Bruning,
et al.,1995). Examples of appropriate projects include: (a) demonstrations
of practical products such as cameras; (b) creation of models to show how
natural phenomena, such as the water cycle, work; (c) illustrations of
scientific concepts, such as magnetism, and how they relate to experienced
phenomena; (d) collections that display and compare variations in objects,
such as insect collections; and (e) investigations that show the effects
of changes in treatment on systems, such as the effects of nutrients on
plant growth (Perry, 1995.)
Educational goals in elementary classrooms encompass students' social,
personal, attitudinal, and cognitive development. In the social domain,
science fair projects help students become responsible and purposeful.
Science fair projects also foster development of a student's sense of personal
capabilities and qualities. Additionally, science fair projects help students
develop an appreciation for nature and the relevance of science in daily
life, thereby promoting positive attitudes toward science. But the primary
focus of science fair projects is on fostering the cognitive and intellectual
development of students.
Participation in science fairs contributes to learning within the constructivist
framework; students build on prior knowledge by gaining and using new information
through their reading, observations, and experimentation. Collaborative
interactions with peers, mentors, parents, and their teacher also enhance
the experience. As Vygotsky has proposed (1979, as cited in Bruning, et
al,1995) in his theory of the "zone of proximal development," the interaction
between a novice and an expert can bring the novice to a higher level of
accomplishment than the novice could expect to reach on his or her own.
One role for teachers in science fair projects, then, is to engage students
in the process of seeking and gaining knowledge, a reflective process that
is enhanced through interactions teachers, peers, and materials.
A BROADER CONTEXT FOR LEARNING
Learning is influenced by a person's level of self-esteem and belief
in his or her ability to learn. Bandura (1986, as cited in Bruning, et
al, 1995) presents learning as being influenced by three components: the
personal beliefs of learners, their behaviors, and the environment. Further,
the behavior of each learner is influenced by his or her sense of self-efficacy,
the level of confidence one has in his or her ability to achieve success.
The sense of self-efficacy is usually domain specific; a student who excels
in art, for instance, may have a lower sense of self- efficacy in science.
Even within a specific domain of success, a student may not believe he
or she can achieve success in a particular setting. For example, a student
who earns an "A" on a science exam may not believe that he or she will
do well in a science fair.
So, science fairs provide another context for learning science; students
have an opportunity to go beyond the planned science curriculum to pursue
individual interests and talents, and to examine practical problems with
hands-on activities that link science with other facets of the curriculum.
Science fairs provide students with opportunities to reflect and make sense
of their total educational experience. (American Association for the Advancement
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). "Benchmarks
for scientific literacy." Washington, DC: Author. [ED 399 180]
Bandura, A. (1986). "Social foundations of thought and action: A social
cognitive theory." Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bruning, R. H., Shraw, G. J., and Ronning R. R. (1995). "Cognitive psychology
and instruction" (2nd ed.). Engle Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Piaget, J. (1969). "The mechanisms of perception." New York: Basic Books
Perry, P. J. (1995). "Getting started in science fairs: From planning
to judging." Blue Ridge Summit, PA: TAB Books. [ED 381 385]
Recht, D.R. & Leslie, L. (1988). Effect of prior knowledge on good
and poor reader's memory on text. "Journal of Educational Psychology,"
80,16-20. [EJ 384 774]
Tant, C. (1992). "Projects: Making hands-on science easy." Angleton,TX:
Biotech Publishing. [ED 374 005]
Vygotsky, L. (1978). "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological
processes." Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [ED 374 005]
Wassermann, S. and Ivany, J. W. (1996). "The new teaching elementary
science: Who's afraid of spiders?" (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College
Press. [ED 396 938]
FOR FURTHER READING:
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). "Science
for all Americans." Washington, DC: Author. [ED 390 509]
Loucks- Horsley, S., Kapitan, R., Carlson, M. O., Kuerbis, P. J., Clark,
R. C., Nelle, G. M., Sachse, T. P., Walton, E. (1990). "Elementary school
science for the 90s." Alexandria, VA: Association for Super-vision and
Curriculum Development. [ED 331 703]
National Research Council. (1996). "National science education standards."
Washing-ton, DC: National Academy Press. [ED 391 690]