ERIC Identifier: ED482326
Publication Date: 2003-12-00
Author: Hammer, Patricia Cahape, Demmert, William G., Jr.
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools
American Indian and Alaska Native Early Childhood Health, Development, and Education Assessment Research. ERIC Digest.
Few scientific studies have focused on American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) infants, toddlers, and young children. Of the studies that have, most tend to focus on particular tribes or Native communities, limiting our ability to generalize to the whole Native American population. This Digest reports on the limited research base that has been created since the late 1980s on issues specific to young AI/AN children. Most of these investigations have taken place in the education assessment and health domains.
Not covered in this Digest are program evaluation studies, which also may be of interest to educators (see Demmert, 2001 and Marks, Moyer, Roche, & Graham, 2003 for in-depth summaries of the research and evaluation literatures).
Infant, neonatal, and postneonatal mortality. A 1998 Indian Health Service report showed solid gains in reducing infant mortality rates in AI/AN communities located in areas served by the Indian Health Service (IHS, 1998). Mortality rates in this report dropped from 62.7 deaths per 1,000 in 1955 to 7.6 in 1995, which is the same rate as for the total U.S. population, though slightly worse than for Whites (6.3 deaths per 1,000 in 1995).
Neonatal mortality rates have also dramatically improved, with a reduction in
Birth weight and growth. Peck and associates (1987) examined the relationship between birth weight and subsequent growth of children, using data routinely collected by the Navajo Nation Special Supplemental Program for Women, Infants, and Children. They reported that children born with weights less than 2,500 grams were consistently shorter, lighter, and thinner than those born with higher weights, and that they never fully caught up with the other Navajo children.
Obesity. However, there appears to be much greater concern about overweight than underweight among young AI/AN children. In a study of 12,559 Indian children age 5-17 in the Aberdeen (SD) area, researchers found a high prevalence of overweight and obesity based on elevated body mass index (BMI) data (Zephier, Himes, & Story, 1999). Zephier et al. reported that among this population, "even at the youngest school ages, overweight is more than twice as likely as national patterns and obesity is more than three times as prevalent" (p. S30). These findings echoed an earlier nationwide study of 9,464 AI schoolchildren (age 5-18 years) living on or near Indian reservations (Jackson, 1993), which concluded that overweight is much more prevalent among AI children than among other U.S. populations in both sexes and at all ages. In an effort to understand why the rates are so high, Harvey-Berino and associates (2000) studied the eating and activity patterns of a group of 20 Mohawk children age 1.5 to 4 years. They discovered that there was no notable difference in the level of the activity or the types of food between the group of 13 overweight children and the group of 7 who were not overweight, but the overweight children consumed an average of 402 calories more energy intake per day. According to the researchers, these findings indicate that reducing dietary fat would be a less effective intervention than adjusting portion sizes, and that efforts to prevent obesity in AI children should begin in infancy, "as obesity rates are already high by the time the children are toddlers" (p. 566).
Hearing and speech. A final AI/AN health-related concern that has received particular study is the relationship of early recurrent otitis media with effusion (OME) [i.e., ear infection] and speech disorder. Thielke and Shriberg (1990) note that a series of studies reported a high incidence of OME among various tribal groups. Their own research has linked early recurrent OME to a 4.63% increased risk for speech disorder among American Indian children (Shriberg et al., 2000). Consequently, they urge increased awareness in the AI/AN community of the risk to normal speech development that is posed by this common medical condition, if left untreated.
ASSESSMENT AND ABILITY
Beginning in 1985, Morton Beiser and colleagues conducted a longitudinal investigation of intellectual development, mental health, and academic achievement among Native children (Beiser & Gotowiec, 2000; Beiser, Sack, & Dion, 1998; Beiser, Dion, & Gotowiec, 2000; Dion, Gotowiec, & Beiser, 1998). The study included 691 Native and 234 non-Native children (grades 2 and 4) from settings in North America representing four of the seven major Indigenous cultural groups as defined by anthropologists: namely, the Plains, Northwest Coast, Northern Woodlands, and Desert groups. One community was selected from each of the four cultural areas, and random comparison samples of non-Natives were drawn from communities located nearby the reservations or reserves. Data were collected from parents, teachers, and students on a wide range of demographic, health, development, linguistic, and other variables. Beiser and his associates continue to analyze data from this study (called the Flower of Two Soils), publishing reports on intellectual development, mental health, and academic achievement findings.
One report (Beiser & Gotowiec, 2000) focused on factors contributing to the lower IQ scores (as measured by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised [WISC-R]) of Native compared to non-Native children in the sample. Using hierarchical multiple regression analyses, the researchers were able to explain most of the difference (12.5 of the 22-point difference in the verbal score and 5.3 of the 7.9-point difference in the performance score) as related to several factors: economic disadvantage, inadequacy of prenatal care, lack of English-language skills, and parental cultural attitudes toward school. Noting the controversy surrounding intelligence testing, especially the testing of nonmainstream populations, Beiser and Gotowiec offered the following explanation for their attention to IQ scores:
To assume that IQ measures "intelligence" is to attribute more weight to IQ scores than they merit. This does not, however, mean that one can simply dismiss IQ testing. IQ scores are a powerful predictor of success in the majority-culture-dominated schools that most Native children attend (2000, p. 247). Further, their study tended to support "the contention of no less an authority than Binet, that the IQ test does not measure anything innate or permanent," and that low IQ scores do not "necessarily signify innate incapacity" (2000, p. 249). Instead there was a collection of environmental factors influencing the young student's performance in this study, including the strained relations between Native parents and schools operated by the larger society.
Other analyses of data from the Flowers of Two Soils and another similar population sample centered on the role of culture in affecting symptoms of hyperactivity or attention deficit disorders in young children. Beiser, Dion, and Gotowiec (2000) concluded that "there is nothing culture-bound about the symptoms of either hyperactivity or attention-deficit. Furthermore, direct comparisons of symptom levels revealed more similarity than difference in the extent to which these patterns affected First Nations and non-Native children in the early school years" (p. 435). The researchers did call for further investigations, however, into the ways "cultural context may affect the response of parents and teachers to these potentially long-lasting problems of childhood" (p. 435).
A widespread concern in AI/AN communities is that standardized assessments may lead to the under- and overrepresentation of AI/AN children in special education programs. Various remedies have been recommended, including renorming tests to local populations, translating test items, developing tests from a cultural context, and using descriptive assessment measures. Several researchers, whose work is outlined in the next paragraphs, investigated approaches to the assessment of young AI/AN children. None of the following studies were based on representative samples and, therefore, cannot be used to make generalizations about practices involving the whole population of young AI/AN children. However, their findings could be indicative of future directions for research.
Noting that there are minimal screening and assessment tools for detecting potential language disorders among AI/AN preschoolers, Christensen and Long (1998) investigated the effectiveness of using the Pediatric Developmental Instrument (PDI), an indirect screening instrument originally normed on tests using large groups of mainstream children. Indirect screening involves collecting data about children based on their caretakers' observations instead of the direct observations of a diagnostician. Based on a small random sample of 20 Head Start children (10 Cherokee and 10 White), the researchers concluded that "the PDI scores for nonreservation, English-speaking Cherokee Indian children found in this study indicated that the
Lastly, in another small survey involving a convenience sample drawn from five regions across the United States that included 20 AI/AN parent respondents (a 59% response rate) and 11 professional respondents (an 85% response rate), Banks (1997) found widespread reliance on norm-referenced standardized assessment instruments in making treatment decisions about the special learning needs of young AI/AN children (8 years and under). She concluded, "The majority of the reported practices revealed gaps between recommended practices and 'in use' practices. There were also some significant differences between the parent/caregiver and professional participant groups regarding assessment practices and corresponding perceptions of validity" (p. 36).
As evidenced in this brief review, research is very scarce that has a focus specifically on early childhood issues in American Indian and Alaska Native health, development, and education. Extant research focuses primarily on infant mortality, birth weight and growth, obesity, and hearing and speech, with little study of intellectual development and academic performance. Not since the mid-1970s has a thorough study of the condition of AI/AN early childhood health, development, and education been conducted.
Banks, S. R. (1997). Caregiver and professional perceptions of assessment practices and validity for American Indian/Alaska Native families. Journal of American Indian Education, 37(1), 16-44.
Baldwin, L., Grossman, D. C., Casey, S., Hollow, W., Sugarman, J. R., Freeman, W. L., et al. (2002). Perinatal and infant health among rural and urban American Indians/Alaska Natives. American Journal of Public Health, 92(9), 1491-1497.
Beiser, M., Dion, R., & Gotowiec, A. (2000). The structure of attention-deficit and hyperactivity symptoms among Native and non-Native elementary school children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28(5), 425-438.
Beiser, M., & Gotowiec, A. (2000). Accounting for Native/non-Native difference in IQ scores. Psychology in the Schools, 37(3), 237-252.
Beiser, M., Sack, W., & Dion, R. (1998). Mental health and the academic performance of First Nations and majority-culture children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(3), 455-468.
Christensen, J. M., & Long, E. E. (1998). Indirect language assessment tool for English-speaking Cherokee Indian children. Journal of American Indian Education, 38(1), 1-14.
Demmert, W. G., Jr. (2001). Improving academic performance among Native American students: A review of the research literature. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 463 917) Retrieved December 19, 2003, from
Dion, R., Gotowiec, A., & Beiser, M. (1998). Depression and conduct disorder in Native and non-Native children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 37(7), 736-743.
Harvey-Berino, J., Wellman, A., Hood, V., Rourke, J., & Secker-Walker, R. (2000). Preventing obesity in American Indian children: When to begin. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 100(5), 564-566.
Indian Health Service. (1998). Trends in Indian health 1998-99. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved December 19, 2003, from
Jackson, M. Y. (1993). Height, weight, and body mass index of American Indian schoolchildren, 1990-1991. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 93(10), 1136-1140.
Marks, E. L., Moyer, M. K., Roche, M., & Graham, E. T. (2003). A summary of research and publications on early childhood for American Indian and Alaska Native children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Peck, R. E., Marks, J. S., Dibley, M. J., Lee, S., & Trowbridge, F. L. (1987). Birth weight and subsequent growth among Navajo children. Public Health Reports, 102(5), 500-507.
Shriberg, L. D., Flipsen, P., Jr., Thielke, H., Kwiatkowski, J., Kertoy, M. K., Katcher, M. L., et al. (2000). Risk for speech disorder associated with early recurrent otitis media with effusion: Two retrospective studies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(1), 79-99.
Thielke, H. M., & Shriberg, L. D. (1990). Effects of recurrent otitis media on language, speech, and educational achievement in Menominee Indian children. Journal of American Indian Education, 29(2), 25-35.
Ukrainetz, T. A., Harpell, S., Walsh, C., & Coyle, C. (2000). A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with Native American kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(2), 142-154.
Zephier, E., Himes, J. H., & Story, M. (1999). Prevalence of overweight and obesity in American Indian school children and adolescents in the Aberdeen area: A population study. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 23(Suppl. 2), S28-30.
Please note that this site is privately owned and is in no way related to any Federal agency or ERIC unit. Further, this site is using a privately owned and located server. This is NOT a government sponsored or government sanctioned site. ERIC is a Service Mark of the U.S. Government. This site exists to provide the text of the public domain ERIC Documents previously produced by ERIC. No new content will ever appear here that would in any way challenge the ERIC Service Mark of the U.S. Government.