ERIC Identifier: ED321424
Publication Date: 1990-00-00
Author: Lumsden, Linda S.
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management Eugene
Meeting the Special Needs of Drug-Affected Children.
ERIC Digest Series Number EA 53.
The problem of drug abuse "has developed a new face--the face of a baby,"
note Donna R. Weston and colleagues (1989). Although drug-affected babies
have been present in our society for several years, their numbers have
risen dramatically since the onset of the crack cocaine epidemic in the
mid 1980s. Lorraine Carli, spokeswoman for the Massachusetts Department
of Social Services, states that crack, a potent smokable form of cocaine,
"seems to have become the drug of choice for women" (Mitchell Landsberg
1990). And New Jersey's acting health commissioner, Dr. Leah Ziskind, attributes
the rising infant mortality rate in that state to "the drug-abusing pregnant
woman, and especially her preference for crack" (Landsberg).
Today, the first crack-affected children are beginning to walk through
the doors of public schools across the country. Many members of this new
"bio-underclass," a term coined by drug abuse expert Douglas Besharov,
will require special services for developmental, behavioral, psychosocial,
and learning problems caused by drug exposure. As more and more drug-affected
children approach school age, school personnel must be prepared to attend
to the special needs of these children and their families/caregivers.
HOW SERIOUS IS THE PROBLEM?
Hospitals are witnessing a disturbing increase in the number of infants
born drug-exposed. When the Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families
conducted a survey of hospitals in 1989, fifteen of the eighteen hospitals
surveyed reported a three- to four-fold increase in drug-exposed births
since 1985 (George Miller 1989). And a recent national study of thirty-six
hospitals conducted by the National Association for Perinatal Addiction
Research and Education (NAPARE) indicates that approximately 11 percent
of pregnant women use drugs during pregnancy. "Nationwide, an estimated
375,000 children each year are born exposed to cocaine," states Debra Viadero
Judy Howard, clinical professor of pediatrics at the University of California,
Los Angeles, School of Medicine, makes the dire prediction that within
a few years 40 to 60 percent of the students attending some inner-city
schools will be children who were exposed to drugs while in the womb (Cathy
WHAT KINDS OF PROBLEMS ARE PREVALENT AMONG DRUG-AFFECTED CHILDREN?
Researchers are beginning to identify a host of problems related to
prenatal drug exposure. The characteristic behaviors of children who have
been prenatally exposed to drugs are due not only to organic damage. Other
risk factors--such as early insecure attachment patterns and ongoing environmental
instability--also contribute to the difficulties.
Behavioral characteristics commonly seen in these children include heightened
response to internal and external stimuli, irritability, agitation, tremors,
hyperactivity, speech and language delays, poor task organization and processing
difficulties, problems related to attachment and separation, poor social
and play skills, and motor development delays (Los Angeles Unified School
Initial findings of an ongoing study that is tracking 300 Chicago-area
infants whose mothers used cocaine and possibly other drugs during pregnancy
suggest that at three years of age many of the children have language problems
and are easily distracted. Dan R. Griffith, a developmental psychologist
participating in the study, which is funded by the National Institute on
Drug Abuse, notes drug-exposed toddlers in the study also tend to score
lower than non-exposed toddlers on tests measuring their ability to concentrate,
interact with others in groups, and cope with an unstructured environment
Naomi Kaufman (1990) identifies other difficulties that may plague drug-affected
children. "At the least," she states, "they include a much higher likelihood
of lower intelligence; short attention spans; hyperactivity; inability
to adjust to new surroundings and trouble following directions-all traits
that can lead to failure in school."
It is important to keep in mind that not all drug-exposed children are
affected similarly. Some children display relatively mild forms of impairment--perhaps
displaying short attention spans and exercising poor judgment. The extent
of impairment in others is severe; children with more serious problems
may be unable to follow directions, engage in highly disruptive behavior,
and have severe language difficulties.
Drug-affected babies and children are often described in terms of specific
areas of impairment. Yet Weston and her colleagues warn that when we generalize
about characteristics prevalent among drug-affected babies or the lifestyles
and personal histories of drug-abusing women, we may unwittingly begin
to engage in stereotyping. Every child must be seen as an individual who
possesses a unique set of strengths and vulnerabilities.
HOW CAN SCHOOLS ASSIST IN PROMOTING OPTIMAL DEVELOPMENT?
Drug-exposed children, like children generally, progress more rapidly
when they are in a predictable, secure, stable environment. School programs
designed for these children, therefore, must include structure, clear expectations,
and boundaries, as well as ongoing nurturing and support (Los Angeles Unified
School District 1989).
Teachers should strive to offset prenatal risk factors and children's
stressful life situations by incorporating protective factors in the classroom
and helping children cope with stress in more appropriate ways. According
to the Los Angeles Unified School District, which began a pilot program
for drug-affected three- to six-year-olds in 1987, attention should be
given to the following areas when creating a classroom environment that
will promote optimal development among drug-affected children:
* Have an adult-child ratio that is high enough to promote attachment,
to provide adequate nurturing, and to assist children in developing more
adaptive methods of coping.
* Create a predictable environment through regular routines and rituals.
* Show respect for children's work and play space.
* Organize the classroom so that materials and equipment can be removed
to reduce stimuli or added to increase stimuli.
* Give special attention to transition time. Transition time should
be viewed as an activity in and of itself. These transitional periods can
help children learn how to deal with change.
* Attend closely to children's language development, social and emotional
development, cognitive development, and motor development. Note how skills
in these areas are being applied by the child during play periods, transition
times, and while involved in self-help activities. Keen observation can
provide insight into how a child experiences stress, relieves tension,
copes with obstacles, and reacts to change. In addition, it helps teachers
become aware of the ways in which children interact with peers and adults.
(Los Angeles Unified School District)
Teachers should seek to acknowledge children's feelings before dealing
with their misbehavior. This conveys the message that the feelings themselves
are not wrong but the way in which they are acted upon may need to be altered.
This approach often results in strengthening a child's desire to function
within prescribed limits. Discussion of behavior and feelings helps children
to develop the ability to distinguish between wishes/fantasies and reality,
integrate their experiences, and gain self-control. Allowing children to
make some choices in the classroom setting encourages a sense of responsibility
and builds problem-solving skills.
In addition, those working with drug-affected children should view the
home as an integral part of the curriculum, since research indicates that
early intervention programs result in long-term positive change only when
parent/caregiver involvement is emphasized. A genuine interest in the well-being
of parents/caregivers can assist in establishing a strong home-school partnership.
SHOULD DRUG-AFFECTED CHILDREN BE PLACED IN SPECIAL PROGRAMS OR REGULAR
The price tag of addressing the needs of drug-affected children is difficult
to estimate because it is unclear what proportion will need to be placed
in self-contained special education classrooms, where the cost per pupil
is considerably higher than in regular classrooms. Mary Ann Stowell, assistant
director of special education in the Portland (Oregon) Public Schools,
admits, "If I thought all of them were eligible for special education,
I would be sweating bullets" (Kaufman).
The Los Angeles and Portland school districts both believe it is preferable
to try to integrate rather than segregate drug-affected children unless
it is apparent that they are urgently in need of special education placement.
The stigma associated with enrollment in such a special program is one
reason. Another is the high cost of educating children in special programs.
The Los Angeles Unified School District spends up to $18,000 a year to
educate each of the three- to six-year-olds in its Pre-Natally Exposed
to Drugs (PED) Program. In comparison, about $4,000 per child per year
is spent to educate children in regular classes (Trost).
Some districts are currently developing plans for educating teachers
about the needs and problems of drug-affected children and how best to
deal with them. The hope is that if regular classroom teachers receive
intensive training, they will be aware of and able to attend to the needs
of drug-affected children in the regular classroom. However, others fear
that the quality of education in regular classrooms will suffer from the
presence of drug-affected children and the demands they will make on teachers.
This, they claim, may eventually result in a two-tier educational system,
in which parents who can afford to do so may elect to enroll their children
in private schools (Kaufman).
When working with drug-affected babies, "the challenge," state Weston
and colleagues, "becomes one of learning how better to help drug-exposed
infants with compromised capacities reach out to the world, and to support
their families in creating a world worth reaching for." As these infants
move through toddlerhood and into childhood, schools can join in this effort.
Kaufman, Naomi. "Schools Brace for Drug Babies." THE OREGONIAN, June
4, 1990, B1, B5.
Landsberg, Mitchell. "Officials Fear Crack Causing Rise in Infant Mortality."
THE REGISTER-GUARD, March 4, 1990. Eugene, Oregon, 4C.
Los Angeles Unified School District. "Today's Challenge: Teaching Strategies
for Working with Young Children Pre-Natally Exposed to Drugs/Alcohol."
Los Angeles, 1989. 21 pages.
Miller, George. "Addicted Infants and Their Mothers." ZERO TO THREE
9, 5 (June 1989): 20-23. ED 311 678.
Trost, Cathy. "As Drug Babies Grow Older, Schools Strive to Meet Their
Needs." THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, December 27, 1989. New York, A1, A2.
Viadero, Debra. "Study of Drug-Exposed Infants Finds Problems in Learning
as Late as Age 3." EDUCATION WEEK 10, 1 (September 5, 1990): 15.
Weston, Donna R., and others. "Drug Exposed Babies: Research and Clinical
Issues." ZERO TO THREE 9, 5 (June 1989): 1-7. ED 311 678.