Site Links



Search for ERIC Digests


About This Site and Copyright


Privacy Policy

Resources for Library Instruction


Information Literacy Blog

ERIC Identifier: ED284910
Publication Date: 1986-00-00
Author: Beard, Jacob G.
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests Measurement and Evaluation Princeton NJ.

Minimum Competency Testing. Update.

During the last decade many school systems began to define minimum levels of competence for their students and to construct tests to measure whether the students had achieved these minimums. These minimum competencies usually include the basic skills of reading, writing, and arithmetic and their application. The term "minimum competency testing" has acquired special meaning from this activity. Considerable controversy arose when, in 1976, the State of Florida passed a law which required high school students to pass a minimum competency test in order to graduate. Many other states now have similar laws. The controversy has centered on the following issues.


During the 1970s there was considerable criticism of the schools, and accusations of lowered achievement were made. To many, minimum competency testing was seen as a means of holding the schools accountable for graduation of literate students who would at least be able to perform the basic skills of reading, writing, and arithmetic. All students would be tested for minimum competencies and failures would be remedied before graduation. Students who were unable to remedy their weaknesses and pass the test before graduation would be given certificates other than high school diplomas.


Minimum competency testing was seen by some as social policy. It was argued by Cohen and Haney (1980) that it was another in a long line of educational minimums which began when elementary education was made compulsory, and was followed periodically by increasing requirements for formal education. Previous minimums have been phrased in terms of age or years of schooling. Cohen and Haney point out that while the establishment of official minimums has the appearance of equalizing achievement, history shows that it merely initiates a new competition for superiority.

Minimum competency testing has also been characterized by its opponents as a racist means of denying educational credentials such as high school diplomas to minority students, and to Black students in particular. This argument is based on the failure rate of Black students, which historically has been greater than that of White students on these and other academic achievement tests. Proponents of minimum competency testing argue that it is a means of identifying achievement deficiencies and insuring that all students receive the basic education to which they are entitled.


Some implications for the instructional program associated with a minimum competency testing program are:

--The testing program must have curricular and instructional validity. The test items must be based on objectives which are taught to every student.

--Remedial instruction should be made available to students who fail the test prior to their retaking it.

--Minimum competency testing programs are generally associated with instructional systems technology. The remedial programs and, indeed, the general instructional procedures typically incorporate the use of behavioral objectives, diagnostic testing, and efficient and focused instructional programs.


When minimum competency tests are used to make decisions having serious consequences for students, the psychometric properties of the test scores become especially important. Individuals who have been denied high school diplomas on the basis of minimum competency test results have sued the educational system. They charge that the use of inadequate tests constitutes violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Therefore, users of such test results should insure that the testing program conforms to or exceeds the standards of quality set forth by the testing profession. These include the Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests published jointly by the American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). The following criteria are especially important for minimum competency tests.

--The tests must have content, curricular, and instructional validity; that is, they must test material which has been taught to all the students.

--Students must be given adequate warning of new standards for graduation.

--The test must reliably assign warning to the categories of pass or fail.

--The passing score representing the achievement of minimum competency must be arrived at rationally and the level of skill it represents must not fluctuate from one test administration to another.

--The test must not contain items which are biased for or against any racial, ethnic, religious, sexual, or other group through characteristics other than the measurement of stated instructional objectives.

--Absolute security of the tests must be maintained.

--Test administrations must be standard at all testing sites.


Minimum competency testing continues to be widely used; however, the legal challenges and controversy surrounding it have tended to subside. Several states have recently initiated testing programs which measure levels of achievement beyond the basic skills within their minimum competency testing programs.


American Psychological Association. STANDARDS FOR EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1985.

Cohen, D. K., and W. Haney. "Minimums, Competency Testing and Social Policy." In COMPETENCY TESTING: MOTIVES, MODELS, MEASURES, AND CONSEQUENCES, ed. R. M. Jaeger and C. K. Tittle. Berkeley: McCutchan, 1980.

Beard, J. G. "Minimum Competency Testing: A Proponent's View." EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS 58(1) (1979): 9-13.

Berk, R. A. A GUIDE TO CRITERION-REFERENCED TEST CONSTRUCTION. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.


Pipho, C. (Ed.) "Minimum Competency Testing." PHI DELTA KAPPAN 59(9) (1978).


Library Reference Search

Please note that this site is privately owned and is in no way related to any Federal agency or ERIC unit.  Further, this site is using a privately owned and located server. This is NOT a government sponsored or government sanctioned site. ERIC is a Service Mark of the U.S. Government. This site exists to provide the text of the public domain ERIC Documents previously produced by ERIC.  No new content will ever appear here that would in any way challenge the ERIC Service Mark of the U.S. Government.

| privacy