ERIC Identifier: ED289362
Publication Date: 1987-11-00
Author: Jarvis, Gilbert A. - Bernhardt, Elizabeth B.
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics Washington DC.
Foreign Language Teacher Education. 1987 Update. ERIC Digest.
The rhetoric surrounding the preparation of foreign language teachers--like the teacher education rhetoric in general--has changed significantly in recent years. An optimistic interpretation of the renewed interest would be a hope that the next several years will see significant change in the preparation of foreign language teachers. As of now, however, Stern and Strevens (1983) are still correct in their conclusion that "we lack an established theory of teacher education, that research is sparse, that some major differences of view persist, and that even the main issues are not yet sharply defined" (p. 1). A recent survey by Bernhardt and Hammadou (1987) revealed that the entire population of published documents dealing with foreign language teacher education since 1976 consisted of only 78 articles. Of these articles a mere eight reported empirical data. Bernhardt and Hammadou conclude that the research base in foreign language education consists of "the perceptions of experienced foreign language educators...rather than (of) a principled collection of data and information" (p. 293) on effective teacher education. In other words, the research base consists of "craft" knowledge learned by trial-and-error experience (Jarvis, 1983).
COMPONENTS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Teacher education programs in foreign language consist, in general, of subject-matter coursework, general education requirements, and specialized education content. These domains have remained relatively unchanged over the past two decades. Recent reform movements in American education, however, characterized by position papers such as those of the Carnegie Commission, A NATION PREPARED: TEACHERS FOR THE 21st CENTURY (1986), and The Holmes Group, TOMORROW'S TEACHERS: A REPORT OF THE HOLMES GROUP (1986), will potentially have a major impact on the composition of each of these teacher education areas.
Subject Matter Content. Coursework for prospective foreign language teachers in the late 1980s consists principally of advanced literature and civilization courses. These courses introduce students to the broad array of literary and cultural trends generally from historical and genre perspectives. One or two courses in composition and/or conversation and stylistics are usually included in the program. Unfortunately, hard data on the actual composition of this coursework from one foreign language teacher education program to another are unavailable (Bernhardt and Hammadou, 1987). However, data on teacher education programs in the teaching of English as a second language show that courses such as linguistics and English grammar predominate in these programs (Bowen, Madsen, and Hilferty, 1985).
General Education Requirements. Teacher education programs also generally include generic courses in educational psychology, philosophy of education, and general methods. These courses give potential teachers skills in classroom management, mainstreaming, and the management of public school systems. The general education requirement may also include field experiences in schools in a variety of grade and subject matter areas; these experiences help future teachers develop a sense for the public school system on a variety of dimensions and also help them understand the commitment they are undertaking in becoming public school teachers.
Specialized Education Content. Fortunately, many large institutions are now able to offer specialized methods courses in foreign language teaching. The development is consistent with the Holmes recommendation for subject-matter pedagogy. These courses focus specifically on the delivery of language instruction at a variety of levels and to a variety of student populations. In addition, these institutions are able to offer field experiences and student teaching experiences supervised by foreign language teaching professionals. A less fortunate side, however, is that these courses are often taught by professionals who were trained during the audiolingual period and who may still view teacher education in terms of components such as the use of drilling and "culture capsules" rather than techniques in communicative language teaching.
Smaller institutions are frequently unable to offer specialized courses. These institutions are able to offer their students only general education courses and generic supervision. Frequently, the foreign language teacher training is delegated to an inservice teacher who is also the cooperating teacher in the student teaching experience, and the supervision of that experience is left to a university supervisor with no expertise in foreign language teaching.
STATE CERTIFICATION AND CREDENTIALING SYSTEMS
Certification standards vary from state to state, and not all states have reciprocal agreements; what one state acknowledges as competence in foreign language teaching another does not. Moreover, it has become increasingly clear within the past decade that what previously constituted "competence in foreign language teaching" is no longer viable. New research and new perspectives integrated from fields such as sociolinguistics, pragmatics, artificial intelligence, and literary theory have relegated grammatical competence to subskill status. New skills and competencies are now being demanded of prospective teachers. By and large, these new skills are the focus of discussion among certification agencies.
The language proficiency of teachers is a growing concern at present. The Bernhardt and Hammadou survey found language proficiency as the main theme in over 30% of the publications on teacher education and an adjunct theme in 17% of them (Hammadou and Bernhardt, 1987). As of 1983, only 10 out of 50 states in the United States required prospective teachers to take an examination in any specialized area for certification. In fact, only in Massachusetts and Georgia are foreign language teachers required to demonstrate oral proficiency in the language in which they are seeking certification (Reschke, 1985). More recently, several states are beginning to discuss the implementation of oral proficiency requirements: Illinois, Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, and Missouri (Dragonas, 1987). Although Massachusetts has developed its own proficiency test, most other states are considering the use of the Foreign Service Institute Oral Proficiency Interview as a required assessment measure.
Oral proficiency is not the only concern of state certification agencies. More than 40 states have enacted laws mandating teacher testing in subject matter as well as in teaching skills. The largest teacher testing program, the NTE, is administered by the Educational Testing Service. The National Teacher Examination (NTE) Program has clients nationwide. The National Examination consists of a "core battery of tests in communication skills, general knowledge, and professional knowledge" (Asfar, 1987). In addition, in foreign language, the NTE has specialty area tests in French, Spanish, and German. These tests evaluate primarily grammatical and cultural knowledge--not communicative ability. A pedagogical knowledge component is under development.
LOOKING TOWARD THE FUTURE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHER EDUCATION
Bernhardt and Hammadou (1987) point out the irony in the lack of attention to secondary school teacher development in the past decades. In their survey, they found that the preponderance of discussion in teacher education had focused on the graduate teaching assistant and university professor level. They state: "Considering that most foreign language teaching in the U.S. is done at the secondary level, this is a disturbing finding" (p. 293). Yet, as we come to the end of the decade, the foreign language profession has begun to attend to teacher education at the secondary level. Hence, the future for reform and improvement is bright. The critical factor, now that public attention has been turned toward teacher education, is research: research on the most appropriate distribution of content coursework, on field placement and experience, on the topic sequence in methods courses in communicative language teaching, and on supervision. A database in these areas will provide a powerful vehicle for the education f sophisticated foreign language teachers for the 21st century.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Asfar, D. ASSESSING TEACHER COMPETENCE. THE NTE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TESTS. Paper presented at the Conference on Policy Issues in Foreign Language Education; Retrospect and Prospect, Columbus, OH, l987.
Bernhardt, E. B. and J. A. Hammadou. "A Decade of Foreign Language Teacher Education." MODERN LANGUGE JOURNAL 71 (1987): 289-299.
Bowen, J. D., H. Madsen, and A. Hilferty. TESOL TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, l985.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. A NATION PREPARED: TEACHERS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (Report of the Task Force on Teaching as a Profession). Hyattsville, MD, l986. ED 268 120.
Dragonas, P. J. IMPLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL REFORM MOVEMENT FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHER EDUCATION. Paper presented at the Conference on Policy Issues in Foreign Language Education; Retrospect and Prospect, Columbus, OH, 1987.
Hammadou, J., and E. B. Bernhardt. "On Being and Becoming a Foreign Language Teacher." THEORY INTO PRACTICE 26 (1987): 301-306.
Holmes Group. TOMORROW'S TEACHERS. East Lansing, MI, 1986. ED 270 454.
Jarvis, G. A. "The Psychology of Second Language Learning: A Declaration of Independence." MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL 67 (l983): 393-402.
Reschke, C. "Proficiency-based Foreign Language Teacher Certification: The Texas Project." ADFL BULLETIN 16 (1985): 17-21.
Stern, H., and P. Strevens. "Georgetown University Round Table on Languages
and Linguistics 1983: In Retrospect." In H. H. Stern and P. Strevens (Eds.),
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ROUND TABLE ON LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS 1983. Washington,
DC: Georgetown University Press, l983.
Library Reference Search
Please note that this site is privately owned and is in no way related to any Federal agency or ERIC unit. Further, this site is using a privately owned and located server. This is NOT a government sponsored or government sanctioned site. ERIC is a Service Mark of the U.S. Government. This site exists to provide the text of the public domain ERIC Documents previously produced by ERIC. No new content will ever appear here that would in any way challenge the ERIC Service Mark of the U.S. Government.