ERIC Identifier: ED289363
Publication Date: 1987-12-00
Author: Inman, Marianne E.
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on
Languages and Linguistics Washington DC.
How Foreign Language Study Can Enhance Career Possibilities.
Proficiency in a foreign language, especially when combined with knowledge of
and skills in another professional area, is highly desirable in the marketplace.
While fields such as librarianship, government and politics, and some areas of
education, seek employees who possess foreign language proficiency in addition
to expertise in their particular discipline, it is business that places the
greatest emphasis on both foreign language capability and knowledge of specific
subject areas like management, tourism, or finance.
HOW DO INTERNATIONAL BUSINESSES VIEW FOREIGN LANGUAGE SKILLS?
A number of studies have shown that American multinational firms rely
overwhelmingly on technical or professional ability as the primary criterion for
selecting managers for international assignments (Inman, 1979). The ability to
adapt to a new environment, along with previous international experience, is
viewed as of secondary importance, while foreign language capability in and of
itself ranks far below the other attributes as a selection factor. In contrast,
a number of Japanese companies require a specified proficiency level in a
foreign language, generally English, before an employee may be sent abroad. In
other cases, notably in European companies, proficiency in English may be a
hiring criterion (Inman, 1983).
Once U.S. employees have been selected for overseas assignments, a majority
of employers provide (or at least make available) language and intercultural
training. In most cases, proficiency in a foreign language is not required. It
is generally considered "desirable but optional." Language training is
ordinarily viewed as a pre-assignment or on-assignment benefit, with attendance
usually voluntary. Employees themselves are often responsible for arranging for
the instruction, although the employer may provide financial support. The amount
of time available for language training is often severely limited, as training
must compete with the press of other activities and obligations in the time
available before departure.
The level of proficiency attainable in corporate-sponsored language training
programs is also limited. Most companies sponsor approximately 100 hours of
instruction, and only limited progress can be anticipated with exposure this
brief. The underlying assumption of this kind of policy is that business matters
will be handled in English; foreign language skills will be used primarily in
social situations or for getting along in everyday activities like shopping,
asking directions, or requesting information. In contrast, proficiency in
English is frequently required of non-native English-speaking corporate
employees, whether the company operations are in the United States or abroad.
Training programs in English (as a second or foreign language) of 500 to 1000
hours and one to two years in length are common.
Many corporate executives cite the extensive use of English in international
settings as the basis for their companies' policies. Some note that the initial
excitement of their employees is followed by discouragement and even frustration
as they become fully aware of the magnitude of the effort required to develop
any meaningful proficiency in another language. Other executives state that
ideally their representatives would speak local languages. Actual practice,
however, has shown that it is a "rare occasion when professional capability,
language capability, and a job assignment all come together at the same time"
WHAT MATERIAL BENEFITS ARE THERE FOR THOSE WITH FOREIGN LANGUAGE SKILLS?
An employee possessing a solid combination of language and
business/managerial skills can have a competitive edge over others without
language capability. Bilingual individuals, often those for whom English is a
second language, are in great demand. A majority of companies meet their
translation and interpreting needs through employees whose major
responsibilities are not language-related. In a few cases, proficiency in a
foreign language may result in a pay differential of up to 10% (Inman, 1985).
For example, the U.S. Army recently adopted a policy of providing a supplement
ranging from $25 to $100 per month to personnel with foreign language skills.
The specific amount of compensation the Army provides is based on the language
known, the individual's proficiency level, and the importance of language skill
to the person's work assignment (Carney, 1987).
WHAT PROBLEMS CAN RESULT FROM NOT KNOWING A FOREIGN LANGUAGE?
While improvements in the business climate have been documented when
individuals with foreign language and cross-cultural skills have been employed,
countless blunders and inefficiencies have also been recorded (Ricks, Fu, and
Arpan, 1974). For example, senior staff members of foreign firms attempting to
enter the complex Chinese market often have no Chinese language proficiency, nor
even a rudimentary knowledge of the social customs or economic system of the
country. They are soon confronted with an unfamiliar bureaucracy and many
Managers admit that miscommunication occurs fairly frequently in
international business settings. In business dealings, details and nuances of
meaning are often missed or misinterpreted by individuals lacking real
proficiency in the language being used, although all parties may believe that
their overall business and daily operations run more smoothly with employees who
are proficient in the foreign language. They also know that communication
problems mean more time required for negotiations and other business dealings.
As a result, efficiency suffers, and decisions are often made on the basis of
incomplete data. Managers also report difficulty in establishing rapport with
their foreign counterparts, as well as limited opportunities for social
interactions due to their lack of language proficiency.
Perhaps even more significant than a lack of foreign language capability,
however, is cross-cultural misunderstanding. Corporate leaders note that
difficulties often occur when "methods of analysis and motivation differ." Of
special concern are the "different approaches to solving problems, getting
cooperation, and achieving agreement," even when all communication takes place
in the same language, notably English.
Although it is difficult to place a monetary value on missed opportunities or
unsuccessful business dealings which result from communication problems, some
companies have documented problem situations their employees have encountered
for use in subsequent training sessions.
HOW HAVE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS RESPONDED TO THE NEED FOR PROFESSIONAL
To meet this need, many colleges and universities, and even secondary
schools, have developed and offered nontraditional, interdisciplinary foreign
language courses. These programs have resulted not only from the demand of the
job market, but also from the dissatisfaction of both foreign language students
and employers with traditional foreign language courses that have provided
learners with inadequate preparation for professional use of their foreign
language skills. Foreign language curricula, therefore, have expanded in scope
from being predominantly literature-oriented to incorporating career training or
professional education. Some nonlanguage fields, especially international
business, have also begun to systematically include foreign language study in
their requirements. In these programs, the content of nonlanguage courses is
frequently presented in the foreign language, thus mutually reinforcing the two
disciplines. A period of study and work abroad is also a common feature of such
Economic interdependence among nations and renewed American interest in other
cultures and peoples have led to increasing enrollments in foreign language
courses, particularly in Pacific Rim languages. An emphasis on cross-cultural
concerns is implicit in these kinds of courses. In addition, student and faculty
exchanges figure prominently in most international programs.
The integration of career and foreign language studies contributes
significantly to both the business community and the foreign language education
profession. It fills a critical need in both disciplines and is leading to
increasingly successful global interactions.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Berryman, S. E. FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES SPECIALISTS: THE
MARKETPLACE AND NATIONAL POLICY. Report prepared by the Rand Corporation for the
National Endowment for the Humanities, 1979. ED 188 486.
Carney, L. "6,800 Soldiers to Receive Language Proficiency Pay." ARMY TIMES,
Sept. 14, l987, l, 61.
Edgerton, M. F., Jr. COMPETENCE IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE: A VALUABLE ADJUNCT
SKILL IN THE EIGHTIES. Paper presented at the Northeast Conference on the
Teaching of Foreign Languages, 1980. ED 191 306.
Inman, M. FOREIGN LANGUAGES, ENGLISH AS A SECOND/FOREIGN LANGUAGE, AND THE
U.S. MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION. (Language in Education series no. l6.)
Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, l979. ED 179
Inman, M. "Interethnic Communication in the International Business
Environment." SOUTHWEST JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS 6 (l983): 133-44.
Inman, M. "Language and Cross-cultural Training in American Multinational
Corporations." MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL 69 (l985): 247-55.
Ricks, D.A., M.Y.S. Fu, and J.S. Arpan. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS BLUNDERS.
Columbus, OH: Grid, l974.
Ristau, R. A. PRESENT AND FUTURE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN INTERNATIONAL
TRADE: A STUDY OF EMPLOYMENT NEEDS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND EMPLOYER EXPECTATIONS IN
INTERNATIONAL TRADE--AN EXAMINATION OF POSITIONS IN BUSINESSES WITH BILINGUAL
REQUIREMENTS. Paper presented at the Eastern Michigan University Conference on
Spanish for Bilingual Careers in Business, 1982. ED 224 305.
Waltz, L. E. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS: STUMBLING THROUGH THE COMMUNICATIONS
CORRIDOR. Paper presented at the Eastern Michigan University Conference on
Spanish for Bilingual Careers in Business, 1982. ED 224 301.
Weatherford, H. J. "Personal Benefits of Foreign Language Study." ERIC
Digest, 1986. ED 276 305.